Secondary School Expansion, Woodstock

We are excited to have submitted a planning application for the expansion of The Marlborough Secondary School in Woodstock, Oxfordshire. The project includes a new 2 storey teaching building to provide an additional 6 classrooms plus supporting accommodation, various internal works and an extension of the sports building to provide 2 new sports changing rooms. Alongside providing new teaching facilities, the project includes significant re-master planning at the front of the school to improve highways safety with additional coach and car parking to reduce pressure on nearby roads. The architecture is robust and simple, integrating well with the existing buildings on the site in its use of materials, whilst also having its own identity. The project is being delivered by Oxfordshire County Council and the River Learning Trust with a consultant team of CBGSolidPaul Basham Associates and Greenwood projects. 

It continues to be busy times for Thinking Buildings in the Education sector. This project is one of a number of school improvement, expansion and master planning projects at various stages of design. We are currently commissioned to deliver another significant secondary school expansion project in Oxfordshire, a new 3 storey 6th form building in London, new sports hall and new dining building in Derbyshire, a new science building currently out to tender, a Post 16 centre currently on site and a scheme at an independent school to transform and extend its existing sports facilities.

More to follow about this exciting range of projects.  

Cottage Project Obtains Consent

We have had the fantastic news that planning has been granted for this cottage project involving a full renovation and significant side and rear extensions in a traditional style. A detached, oak framed out-building provides car parking, garden store and a home office within the loft space.

We look forward to bringing you more as the work progresses.

Listed Buildings Have Many Uses . . .

The core of the Listed Building Consent process is to establish if the proposed works and use are compatible with the historic significance of the existing structure. Part of this is the function of the building. Sometimes changing the function or use of a building is a bigger hurdle than any other part of the application. Converting a historic agricultural barn to a home for example, is changing it’s use, so often a conservation officer will be focussed on preserving more of the form and fabric to compensate for the impact of that change of use. This is an emphasis we are very used to working with.

In the case of this listed building however, a five storey town house in London’s Harley Street, the use as a private dental practice is entirely compatible with the area’s long history of private medical and health practices. The challenge then comes in providing a 21st Century treatment environment while preserving as much of the historic fabric of the building as possible. It has been interesting to see how this changes the key information and detail needed to support the submission. 

This scheme was submitted for consideration in June and we await to hear of the outcome.

The Top 10 Passivhaus Myths

In the UK we have become so used to living in high energy consuming, draughty or stuffy buildings that most people find it hard to imagine how they would feel living in a Passivhaus. Here are the 10 most common misconceptions:

  1. You can’t open the windows

A Passivhaus doesn’t rely on the occupant to open the windows as the mechanical ventilation system (MVHR) ensures good air quality all year round. However, opening the windows at night during the summer to get rid of excess heat is usually part of the comfort strategy. Windows can be opened during the winter too, but more energy will then be required to heat the space.

  1. They are too stuffy

A Passivhaus is very airtight to prevent draughts and heat loss. This also means the MVHR system works efficiently, continuously supplying fresh pre-warmed (or cooled) air from outside in all weathers, and getting rid of the stale air without the need to open a window, making them the very opposite of stuffy.  This creates a constant, comfortable indoor temperature and has the added benefit of a mould and moisture free environment.

  1. It’s too expensive

A building designed to be a Passivhaus from the start, with an efficient building form and designed with the principles of building physics, can be delivered cost effectively. It is much harder and more expensive to turn a complicated and inefficient design into a Passivhaus. As their popularity increases, Passivhaus buildings are becoming more affordable and there are the additional long-term savings from reduced energy use.

  1. They don’t need heating

Passivhaus buildings rely on passive heat sources from solar gains (the sun) and internal gains (body heat and appliances). By reducing the amount of heat lost through insulation and detailing, only a small amount of additional heating is required to create a comfortable indoor temperature.  While they do still need heating, it is greatly reduced compared to a traditional building.

  1. They’re too complicated

Achieving the Passivhaus requirements can be complicated for designers, but the occupant knowing how to control the MVHR system is the hardest thing that needs to be learnt.

  1. They look ugly

Architecture has, and always will be, subjective. Passivhaus is a performance standard, not a design one. Passivhaus buildings can be built in a variety of designs and styles based on a client’s wishes.

  1. The ventilation is too noisy

A correctly designed, installed, and maintained MVHR system is very quiet and barely perceptible. The rate of air movement is much less than from a conventional air conditioning unit, making it much quieter and less energy consuming.

  1. They get too hot in summer

A Passivhaus is well insulated and good at keeping heat in, and if properly designed, they are also good at keeping heat out. There is some reliance on occupants to reduce excess heat by opening windows at night to prevent any overheating.

  1. It’s just for houses

Passivhaus translates as ‘passive houses or buildings’ as the German ‘haus’ refers to both. The design principles are based on building physics, so they can be applied to most buildings including schools, offices, museums, hospitals and swimming pools.

  1. They’re too dry

As the ventilation in a Passivhaus is provided by the MVHR system there is less excess moisture than in a conventional house, but this also means no mould or condensation, and the constant relative humidity allows for a much healthier indoor environment. 

Hopefully this has highlighted the many positive benefits of a Passivhaus. Rachel, our accredited Passivhaus designer, is passionate about designing and building energy efficient homes. If you are interested and have further questions, do get in touch here.