Delays With Planning Applications

One thing we are constantly faced with is delays in the planning application system. This can be for multiple reasons.  It is always frustrating, but can risk timescales and increase costs.

This can strain relationships with clients as they can often feel we have more control over the process than we actually do.

It’s very common for a planning officer to ask for an extension of time on a planning application. Should you agree or not?

It’s not as easy as it sounds.

If you don’t agree to an extension of time on a planning application, the local planning authority (LPA) is legally required to make a decision within the original statutory time limit. This is usually:

  • 8 weeks for most minor applications
  • 13 weeks for major applications
  • 16 weeks if an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is required

Here’s what happens in practice if you refuse or withdraw your agreement to extend time:

1. The LPA must decide “as is”

The council must either approve or refuse the application based on the information currently available.

If the case officer hasn’t yet completed consultations, received key reports, or resolved issues, they’ll often refuse the application to meet the statutory deadline.

This is often done using a standard reason such as “Insufficient information has been provided to assess the proposal against relevant planning policies.”

2. The “deemed refusal” right to appeal

If the LPA fails to issue a decision in time and no extension of time has been agreed, you (the applicant) gain the right to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate for non-determination (under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990).

However:

  • This can take several months,
  • It usually requires paying appeal fees and providing updated documents,
  • The Inspectorate will assess the application as if it were being determined anew, including all the same policies and material considerations.

3. Relationship with the LPA

Refusing an extension can strain relations with the planning officer. Councils often ask for extensions to allow:

  • Completion of consultee responses,
  • Negotiation of amendments or conditions, or
  • Committee scheduling.

If you decline, they may be less inclined to negotiate or support minor revisions later.

4. Strategic considerations

It’s sometimes reasonable not to agree to an extension — for example:

  • If the council has unreasonably delayed the process,
  • If you want to trigger an appeal to get an independent decision, or
  • If the delay would affect your funding, contracts, or programme.

But in most cases, agreeing a short extension (a week or two) allows the officer to resolve issues and potentially approve the application without the cost or risk of an appeal.

An applicant needs to consider all the factors carefully. You should always seek advise before making any decision.

Preliminary Paragraph 84 Design

Whilst it’s only early stages and preliminary thoughts, it’s great to share this exciting sketch of a partly earth sheltered Paragraph 84 house design that we have been involved with recently. Thinking Buildings has worked on a few of these aspirational projects over the years, working within the Paragraph 84 clause of the UK’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), that sets out various circumstances which can enable the erection of new isolated dwellings in the open countryside. The key driver behind these policies is to deliver highly sustainable houses of exceptional quality and this sets a very high bar for both client and architects, demanding a design approach of the highest quality.

We hope that we will have more positive news to share about this project in the future.

Improvements at Granville Academy for Affinity Learning Partnership

Thinking Buildings continues to enjoy a strong working relationship with the Affinity Learning Partnership, formerly The de Ferrers Trust, supporting them with improvements across their schools. At Granville Academy in Woodville, Swadlincote, we are pleased to confirm that the playground, toilets and office projects have now reached the end of their defects period.

Working alongside Davlyn Construction, SA Consulting and Approved Inspectors Building Control, the project has delivered a significant transformation to the academy’s main external social space. Achieved through very simple and cost-effective design solutions, the works included new ramps, steps and resurfacing. These improvements not only make student movement across the sloping site easier and more accessible, but also encourage socialising and even create potential for external teaching spaces.

Internally, the project provided new office space and refurbished toilets, both of which will help deliver a more comfortable and practical environment for staff and students. These changes reflect the Partnership’s continued commitment to investing in facilities that positively support learning and wellbeing across their schools.

This has been another positive project with Affinity Learning Partnership, and it has been great to see the benefits now being enjoyed by the school community.