Just Building One House? You Still Need To Know About CIL!

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a development tax introduced in England and Wales in 2010 to support local authorities in funding the necessary infrastructure for new developments in their areas. Local governments can impose this charge on most types of new development, allowing them to secure funds for essential services that will benefit the growing population. The CIL has been a significant tool in ensuring that local communities can maintain their quality of life and access to resources, even as new residential, commercial, and industrial projects are established.

Purpose and Rationale
The CIL was created to provide a fair, transparent, and predictable way to fund infrastructure improvements that meet the demands of increased development. The primary purpose of the CIL is to make sure that local communities can benefit from, and sustain, the influx of people, businesses, and services associated with growth in the area. Infrastructure is crucial to supporting both local economies and community well-being. Roads, schools, healthcare facilities, parks, and other public resources are essential for thriving communities, and as new developments are established, they put additional strain on these resources.

Unlike the previous approach, which primarily relied on Section 106 agreements, the CIL provides a more straightforward, upfront charge that developers pay based on the size and type of their projects. Section 106 agreements are still in use but are typically reserved for site-specific obligations rather than wider infrastructure funding. The CIL provides a clearer path for local governments to gather resources, enabling them to budget and allocate funds for key infrastructure projects that serve the community as a whole.

Scope and Applicability
The CIL applies to most new developments that create additional floor space of 100 square meters or more. In the case of new dwellings, however, the levy is applied regardless of the size, ensuring that all housing developments contribute to the local infrastructure. The charge generally applies to both residential and non-residential developments, including commercial and industrial projects, although there are exceptions and reliefs available (which will be discussed later).

The CIL charge is levied at the planning stage, meaning developers are aware of the costs before they commence work. This transparency helps developers make informed financial decisions and allows local councils to project how much revenue they can expect from developments in their jurisdiction.

Calculating the CIL Charge
One of the distinctive aspects of the CIL is that it is calculated based on a “charging schedule” set by each local authority, which considers the infrastructure needs and development patterns within its boundaries. The rate of the CIL varies between different areas and often between types of development within the same area. For instance, high-demand residential areas may have higher rates compared to low-demand areas, and commercial or retail developments might be charged at different rates than industrial or office spaces.

Local authorities determine CIL rates on a per-square-meter basis, so larger developments naturally incur higher charges. This square meter calculation allows the levy to scale with the size of the development, ensuring that those which will place the greatest demand on infrastructure contribute proportionately. Each authority’s charging schedule is subject to public consultation and examination by an independent examiner before it can be adopted. This process is meant to ensure fairness and that the rates are set in accordance with local economic viability, balancing the need for infrastructure funding with developers’ capacity to pay.

It should be noted that in Greater London developers may be obliged to pay Mayoral CIL and also any CIL levied by the London Borough in which the development is proposed.

Exemptions and Reliefs
Although the CIL is broadly applied to new developments, there are specific exemptions and reliefs designed to encourage certain types of development or to reduce the financial burden on particular projects. These exemptions and reliefs help ensure that the levy does not unintentionally discourage developments that may be beneficial to the community.

1. Minor Developments: Generally, developments under 100 square meters that do not create a new dwelling are exempt from the CIL. This exemption is intended to relieve small projects, which may not significantly impact infrastructure demands.

2. Self-Build Homes: Self-build projects are often granted relief from the CIL. This includes homes built by individuals for their personal use, as well as residential annexes and extensions. Self-build exemptions help support individual home builders and allow for small-scale, personal projects without the additional burden of CIL costs.

3. Charitable Developments: Charities developing property for charitable purposes may also qualify for exemptions. This provision helps charities maximize the benefits of their investments in local communities, particularly in cases where they are developing facilities like community centers, affordable housing, or other projects with direct public benefit.

4. Affordable Housing: Projects that provide affordable housing are typically exempt from the CIL, in line with government goals to address housing affordability and support vulnerable groups. This exemption supports the creation of low-cost housing options, which are essential to meeting the needs of the community without increasing the cost burden on the developers.

Use of CIL Funds
The funds collected through the CIL are allocated to infrastructure projects within the local area, supporting development in ways that benefit the community directly. Local authorities are required to publish an “Infrastructure Funding Statement” each year, which outlines how they plan to use the CIL revenue and provides transparency around infrastructure priorities. The types of infrastructure that can be funded through the CIL are varied, and local councils are given discretion to address their specific needs. Common uses of CIL funds include:

1. Transport Networks: Improving roads, bridges, public transit systems, and other aspects of the transportation network is a frequent priority. Effective transportation infrastructure supports local economies and helps prevent congestion issues that can arise from increased development.

2. Educational Facilities: With more residents comes the need for expanded educational facilities. CIL funds can be used to build new schools, expand existing ones, or provide additional resources that support a growing student population.

3. Healthcare Services: Growing communities require expanded healthcare services, from clinics and hospitals to mental health facilities. CIL revenue can help fund these essential services, ensuring that residents have access to adequate healthcare.

4. Parks and Public Spaces: Parks, recreation areas, and other public spaces are integral to community well-being. CIL funds allow local authorities to create or enhance these spaces, providing areas for relaxation, exercise, and community events.

5. Flood Defenses and Environmental Protections: In areas where development may increase flood risks or impact local ecosystems, CIL funds can be directed toward flood defense projects, drainage systems, and other environmental protections.

Benefits and Limitations of the CIL
The Community Infrastructure Levy has proven to be an effective way to ensure that new developments contribute to the wider community by supporting necessary infrastructure. The transparency of the CIL process—where developers know the charge from the outset—provides a level of predictability that was lacking under the previous reliance on Section 106 agreements. Additionally, because the CIL is applied to almost all types of development, it provides a more equitable system where every new project contributes to the community’s infrastructure needs.

However, there are some limitations to the CIL. Not all local authorities have adopted the levy, often due to challenges in determining appropriate rates or because they prefer using Section 106 agreements for specific projects. Additionally, while the CIL provides essential funds, it is rarely enough to cover all infrastructure needs, meaning local authorities must often seek additional funding sources. The flexibility to set local rates can also create discrepancies between neighboring areas, with some regions potentially setting rates too low to cover their infrastructure needs or too high, discouraging development.

Conclusion
In summary, the Community Infrastructure Levy is a tool for local authorities in England and Wales, enabling them to raise funds to support infrastructure improvements and meet the demands of growing populations. By charging developers based on the size and type of their projects, the CIL ensures that new developments contribute to the community resources they depend on.

From 2010 to 2017, 138 local authorities in England and Wales had adopted the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), while nearly 230 had published draft charging schedules for consultation.  The Planning Resource website maintains a “CIL Watch” map and database, offering up-to-date information on local authorities’ CIL adoption status.

Oxfordshire site redevelopment

This exciting mixed use site redevelopment close to Oxford is taking shape as it progresses towards a planning application. The scheme redevelops an existing commercial site with 2 new proposed buildings; a 3 storey, 500m2 office building, and a 9 unit apartment building. The design includes soft tonal brickwork and zinc standing seam cladding with the top floors set back to reduce the overall building mass, and to provide balconies and terraces. 

This is one of a number of mixed use site redevelopments currently being designed by Thinking Buildings in the practices growing portfolio.

Listed Townhouse Case Study

We have another case study to share! We’ve recently added to the portfolio of developer housing projects, this Grade II* listed building conversion. The original building was a schoolhouse, and is located in central historic Cirencester. With declining use, and having fallen increasingly into disrepair, Thinking Buildings were appointed to provide proposals for reuse of the building.

There were a couple of options for this, both of which achieved a successful listed building consent, firstly as six apartments, and then as two townhouses. The latter scheme was executed by a developer to an excellent standard, resulting in a Cirencester Civic Society award.

https://thinking-buildings.co.uk/news/developer/listed-townhouse-conversion-cirencester/

New Case Study – Apartment Building, East Oxford

Our latest case study we have shared to the website is this development of nine apartments in East Oxford. Planning permission was obtained in 2022 for this challenging single aspect, gap site. Find out more about this project and how we can help developers get the best return from complex plots in the full case study here.

Cirencester School Conversion

Powell’s School House is a Grade II* listed property (particularly important buildings of more than special interest) located close to the centre of Cirencester.

Thinking Buildings were initially appointed as architects for a feasibility study for the conversion of the school house from education to residential use. The existing school house was significantly compromised for educational use, with mainly small rooms spread across three floors and no lift access. The top floor was entirely unused and the building’s condition was deteriorating as a result of the building’s limited use. 

Following the feasibility study, we developed a full design to successfully secure planning and listed building consent to convert this beautiful historic building into six apartments. This involved detailed research into the history of the building and detailed consultation with English Heritage and the local conservation officer. Detailed design proposals were submitted as part of the application to address the complexities of incorporating a new staircase, drainage, and services into the scheme and to successfully accommodate adequate acoustic and fire separation between units without causing any substantial harm to the existing fabric of the heritage asset. 

Thinking Buildings were later commissioned to alter the planning and listed building consent to convert the property into 2 substantial townhouses which would be less impactful and more sensitive to the existing listed building. Planning and listed building consent was granted and the School House was purchased by a local developer to convert the building. 

Alongside building alterations the project also included the re-working of external areas to separate the new residential use from the existing primary school. This included new boundary walls, railings, and a new pupil entrance with gates into the site. We are proud that these works were given a Cirencester Civic Society award. 

The Use Of Zinc For Homes & Houses

At Thinking Buildings we often use zinc elements in our residential projects. It is a versatile material suitable for various architectural styles and design applications. It can be used in contemporary, traditional, and historical building projects, looking equally appropriate and attractive in various contexts.

Zinc has a long history of use in construction. Zinc’s earliest known use is by ancient civilizations for decorative purposes, as its corrosion-resistant properties made it valuable for architectural embellishments. Later in the 17th to 19th centuries, technology allowed zinc to be used more widely. Zinc is highly resistant to corrosion, making it an excellent choice for roofing, cladding, gutters, and downspouts. It can last for several decades without significant degradation. Such was its popularity, it formed the character of cities like Paris, where it was used extensively in the late 19th century. 

Zinc’s continued popularity in contemporary architecture stems from the combined properties of a sleek, sharp appearance, while being incredibly low maintenance, long lasting, and sustainable. 

Zinc has an attractive appearance that evolves over time. Raw zinc starts with a shiny, metallic finish and gradually develops a matte grey patina, which many people find appealing. For a more consistent finish, zinc and be pre-patinated, with the addition of colour to tint the zinc into a variety of attractive shades. This evolving aesthetic can blend with the character of a historic building, or give depth to a contemporary project. 

Zinc is a very environmentally friendly material. When properly installed and maintained, zinc can have a long lifespan, often exceeding 50 years. This longevity contributes to its cost-effectiveness and minimises its environmental impact over the lifespan of the building.  It is also fully recyclable at the end of its life, and the recycling process requires significantly less energy compared to primary zinc production, further reducing its impact.

While zinc has many advantages as a building material, it is essential to consider factors like initial cost, regional climate conditions, and specific project requirements when deciding whether it’s the right choice for a particular construction project. However, for many applications, zinc is indeed a good building material due to its combination of durability, aesthetics, and sustainability.

Thinking Buildings Commended at OPT Awards

Thinking Buildings enjoyed a fantastic evening at the Oxford Preservation Trust (OPT) awards. We were absolutely thrilled to be shortlisted for best small project and to be presented with a certificate for our new build Bartlemas Road infill scheme, in recognition of it’s positive contribution to the Oxford environment – a simple yet bold design within the street scene. It was also great to view the other projects and award winners – a really exciting and interesting mix of projects in our city. Congratulations to all the entrants and award winners, and a big thank you to the efforts of the OPT team, the kind sponsors and our client for their support throughout. 

A full case study of this interesting scheme can be found on our web site.

Credit also to AKSWard Limited as structural and civil engineers, ERS Consultants Ltd and the contractor Cheltenham Build.

Photograph by Ed Nix, courtesy of OPT.

Success at Planning for Gap Site Development

We’re happy that this great scheme has received planning permission this week!

A gap site on a residential side street in East Oxford, this scheme provides nine 1-bed and 2-bed apartments with easy access to all the amenities of Cowley Road. With adjacent buildings on three sides, the challenge of this site was negotiating the mass of the building against existing openings near the boundaries. The current building on the site defines the maximum heights of the new building, which comprises of two main forms, a two-storey pitched roof form and a three-storey flat roofed section.

The palette of the building is kept simple with a predominantly brick façade, with interest created with reconstituted stone facades and varying planes to the brickwork. The pitched roof is in slate, with the entrance being signposted by zinc standing seam cladding. A car free development, designed to meet the new thermal and energy consumption regulations, this building will be highly sustainable.

Peak District National Park Development Ready For Planning

Thinking Buildings have been working alongside a Derbyshire based developer to bring nine much needed family homes to a small Peak District National Park village.  Part of a wider design team, Thinking Buildings are balancing the developers desire for a contemporary rural aesthetic and strong sustainability agenda with the sensitivity of the National Park setting.

More will follow next month when the scheme goes on public display to local residents as the project progresses through to a full planning application which we hope to be submitted towards the end of the year.

Shortlisted for Oxford Preservation Trust Awards

Hot off the press, we are pleased to be able to share that this small developer scheme in East Oxford has been shortlisted for the Oxford Preservation Trust Awards. Fingers crossed that we do well at the awards night in November.